what the bleep do we know debunked

Q. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. They don't go anywhere, Fred. (I haven't). The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. You can't just hope for the best. Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. In the last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Krauss says "no area of physics stimulates more nonsense in the public arena than quantum mechanics." It's there. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. I was expecting something pretty dumb, but am always interested to see what people think about quantum mechanics. It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. Get ABC Sciences weekly newsletter Science Updates, The 'underground astronaut' in search of ancient bones, Voyager probes still signalling from the edge of the Solar System, Solar eclipses: Everything you need to know, Five ways your smartphone could help save lives, Chinese scientists use satellite to smash quantum entanglement record, Einstein's light bending theory directly observed in distant stars for first time, Third gravitational wave detection puts new spin on black holes. It took a while, but the comparison finally came through on the association of strings, as a quantum mechanical perspective, and the relationship to that movie. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Pingback: Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, Pingback: For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. We'll never know. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . Check out this great listen on Audible.com. Though not marketed as such, those who have seen it note that it degenerates into an extended infomercial for channeler J. Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . Do We Know!? It'd be like being the CEO of a massive company and having to listen to what every single employee was doing every minute of every day. A movie and a book said that water molecules are. To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. Awash in New Age theorizing, real world science and the intellectually unfathomable notion of quantum mechanics, What the 'Bleep' Do We Know!? It's there. suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. Joe Dispenza, former Ramtha School of Enlightenment teacher, This page was last edited on 13 February 2023, at 23:23. A: Quantum mechanics is often quoted as the explanation for many things, because it's so weird that people latch onto it as a hope, to explain everything that they would like to believe about the universe. (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? The quantum world does pervade everything around us, but as Richard Feynman liked to say, "Scientific creativity is imagination in a straitjacket." My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot. You can begin to be skeptical that the speaker is somehow trying to use quantum mechanics to argue fundamentally that you can change the world by thinking about it. That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. Her experiences are offered by the filmmakers to illustrate the film's scientifically-unsupported thesis about quantum physics and consciousness. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. For traditional Christians, God is God not because your brain is making him up, but because he is. He claims that in over 5 hours of interviews he explained to the film makers why their concept of how Quantum Physics works has virtually no support in the scientific community. Z. Knight and heavily features commentary from 'Ramtha', an ancient Atlantian general who is apparently speaking through Knight. "I begin the book with a quote from Feynman that says, 'Reality takes precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled,'" he told me. " " " !". This will be revisited if any. Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. Ive not seen the movie, and dont intend to, but David Alberts book on Quantum Mechanics and Experience is one of the best things Ive read on the interpretation of QM. Prominent if you go by citations that is. He even called in to a radio program the director was on to discuss this and was cut off. The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. But sounding like magic and being magic are two different things. unless you renew or List of films featuring the deaf and hard of hearing, "How the NXIVM Sex Cult Defended Trump from Media Attacks", "Cinefex article detailing the visual effects for the film", "New Age: What the Bleep? But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. Q: Some scientists, such as Sir Roger Penrose, have talked about neurons as quantum systems. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. That's why we experience a classical world. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). We're always being told we don't use our brain to its full capacity. Happy Water Crystals Debunked as PseudoScience June 23rd, 2018 - Are Dr Masaru Emoto?s Fantastic Claims Actually Real Via is masaru emoto . In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). Hard to get your head around What the Bleep Do We Know. A: Of course it does. presents a viewpoint of the physical universe and human life within it, with connections to neuroscience and quantum physics.

Paragon Federal Security Officer, Articles W